<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution or revolution? How big media is trying to fix journalism&#8217;s broken financial model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediabastard.co.uk/2010/02/09/evolution-or-revolution-how-big-media-is-trying-to-fix-journalisms-broken-financial-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediabastard.co.uk/2010/02/09/evolution-or-revolution-how-big-media-is-trying-to-fix-journalisms-broken-financial-model/</link>
	<description>Cutting through the crap of the media industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:29:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: “No time like now to enter journalism,” says the Guardian’s Emily Bell. But where’s the money? &#171; Media Bastard</title>
		<link>http://mediabastard.co.uk/2010/02/09/evolution-or-revolution-how-big-media-is-trying-to-fix-journalisms-broken-financial-model/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[“No time like now to enter journalism,” says the Guardian’s Emily Bell. But where’s the money? &#171; Media Bastard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediabastard.co.uk/?p=252#comment-177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (branded content) and The Times (impending paywalls) have taken a different tack, as mentioned in a previous Media Bastard piece. The problem for the Guardian is that it has gone into direct competition with an organisation that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (branded content) and The Times (impending paywalls) have taken a different tack, as mentioned in a previous Media Bastard piece. The problem for the Guardian is that it has gone into direct competition with an organisation that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathon Oake</title>
		<link>http://mediabastard.co.uk/2010/02/09/evolution-or-revolution-how-big-media-is-trying-to-fix-journalisms-broken-financial-model/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Oake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediabastard.co.uk/?p=252#comment-141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post.

I don&#039;t think there&#039;s been all that much analysis of how the Mirror/Telegraph/Daily Mail etc have been approaching this. The focus has been more on Guardian vs News Int, and it&#039;s clearly a lot more nuanced than that.

What the Mirror&#039;s doing has been niche-ing down properties into core content strands, and in so doing creating a more rewarding, targeted experience for users, driving loyalty, but without losing UUs either (check the ABCes). This creates a more valuable environment for advertiser, so Mirror should be well placed in event of a much-rumoured recovery in advertiser CPMs (believe that when I see it!).

(PS: i work for the Mirror, but don&#039;t speak for them here. this is my own viewpoint)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s been all that much analysis of how the Mirror/Telegraph/Daily Mail etc have been approaching this. The focus has been more on Guardian vs News Int, and it&#8217;s clearly a lot more nuanced than that.</p>
<p>What the Mirror&#8217;s doing has been niche-ing down properties into core content strands, and in so doing creating a more rewarding, targeted experience for users, driving loyalty, but without losing UUs either (check the ABCes). This creates a more valuable environment for advertiser, so Mirror should be well placed in event of a much-rumoured recovery in advertiser CPMs (believe that when I see it!).</p>
<p>(PS: i work for the Mirror, but don&#8217;t speak for them here. this is my own viewpoint)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Evolution or revolution? How big media is trying to fix journalism’s broken financial model « Media Bastard -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://mediabastard.co.uk/2010/02/09/evolution-or-revolution-how-big-media-is-trying-to-fix-journalisms-broken-financial-model/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention Evolution or revolution? How big media is trying to fix journalism’s broken financial model « Media Bastard -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediabastard.co.uk/?p=252#comment-140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Alex Walters, Alex Walters, Alex Walters, Alex Walters, Paul Hood and others. Paul Hood said: Great piece here by @alexwalters: a response to John Lloyd&#039;s comment on Journalism&#039;s &#039;broken financial model&#039; http://bit.ly/aes0xn [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Alex Walters, Alex Walters, Alex Walters, Alex Walters, Paul Hood and others. Paul Hood said: Great piece here by @alexwalters: a response to John Lloyd&#39;s comment on Journalism&#39;s &#39;broken financial model&#39; <a href="http://bit.ly/aes0xn" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aes0xn</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

